Advanced Search Filters

In addition to or instead of a keyword search, use one or more of the following filters when you search.

Skip to main content
Boder, David interview Tichauer 1946

1 of 14 Collections in

Jewish Perspectives on the Holocaust

Post-Holocaust Testimony

What is meant by "testimony" in the context of Holocaust history? Post-Holocaust testimony often refers to witness accounts given in postwar legal trials. It also describes other forms of communicating experiences that are often deeply personal and traumatic. Sources in this collection explore different types of post-Holocaust testimonies and their significance—both for survivors and for students of the Holocaust.


Post-Holocaust Testimony

The word "testimony" is one of the most widely used terms in Holocaust research, but it is not always clearly defined. This raises many questions. Does it refer only to the act of testifying in a courtroom following the war, such as in the Nuremberg Trials of the late 1940s? Or does testimony also include less formal postwar interviews with Jewish survivors? Are survivor memoirs also forms of testimony? How might testimonies change when they are given in front of an audience? 

Survivor testimony about the Holocaust played important roles in postwar legal trials. Witness statements like the Nuremberg trial testimony of Avrom Sutzkever or the Auschwitz trial testimony of Otto Wolken added vivid personal details to the proceedings. Jewish historical commissions also gathered survivor testimonies and records, such as the testimony of Fiszl Kuszner or the children's questionnaire of Josef Munzer. These commissions collected survivor testimonies to help pursue justice, but they also gathered these accounts for the purposes of historical preservation. 

Read More

Some of the earliest recorded survivor interviews were collected solely in order to preserve these early testimonies. Sociologist David Boder began recording interviews with survivors in summer 1946. His interview with Helen Tichauer raises several questions about how early postwar survivor interviews might have been shaped by the recording technology, the language used, and the line of questioning.1

Interviews recorded decades later raise other questions about memory and the broader context in which a testimony is given. What topics were considered off limits at the time that an interview was given? What was considered important to ask about at the time? Recorded interviews with Gertrude Schneider and Ruth Elias include personal details that may not have been shared in the years immediately after the war. Oral histories with Charlene Schiff and Henry Kanner reflect on the power that individual memories still have years after the events. 

Scholars have been studying the nature of memory and survivor testimony for decades.2 Although survivor testimonies have certain limitations as historical sources, scholars have shown how these testimonies can form the basis for important historical research and add new dimensions to the study of the Holocaust.3 The timing and context of an individual testimony could greatly shape its content. How might the language, the setting, or the date of a testimony change its shape? What was a testimony's intended purpose? These questions are important to consider when studying any form of Holocaust testimony.

This collection shows just some of the wide variety of postwar interviews and documents considered "testimonies." The featured sources include courtroom testimonies, recorded interviews, and written records. Some of these testimonies were created shortly after the events described, while others are given decades later. Although they are each very different, these testimonies all preserve firsthand accounts and add important personal details to our understanding of the history of the Holocaust.

To learn more about David Boder's interviews, see Alan Rosen, The Wonder of their Voices: The 1946 Holocaust Interviews of David Boder (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).


To learn more, see Lawrence Langer, Holocaust Testimonies: The Ruins of Memory (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991); Henry Greenspan, On Listening to Holocaust Survivors: Beyond Testimony (St. Paul, MN: Paragon House, 2010); and Shoshana Felman and Dori Laub, Testimony: Crisis of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History (New York: Routledge, 2013). See also Annette Wieviorka, The Era of the Witness, trans. Jared Stark (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006).

For example, see Christopher Browning, Remembering Survival: Inside a Nazi Slave-Labor Camp (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2010); Omer Bartov, Erased: Vanishing Traces of Jewish Galicia in Present-Day Ukraine (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007); and Jürgen Matthäus, ed., Approaching an Auschwitz Survivor: Holocaust Testimony and Its Transformations (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).

All 22 Items in the Post-Holocaust Testimony Collection

Thank You for Supporting Our Work

We would like to thank The Alexander Grass Foundation for supporting the ongoing work to create content and resources for Experiencing History. View the list of all donors and contributors.


Learn more about sources for your classroom